Author Archive
How Clouds will change Business Transaction Management
by Anonymous, January 2011.
I hate clouds, they generally deliver cold weather and make life dull. I especially hate them even more because they’ve recently made my job more difficult (and working in product management it’s not exactly plain sailing at the best of times). I did try my best to avoid Cloud Computing by simply pretending it was all madness. Sadly, this naive approach didn’t work and here I am writing a blog on the subject.
For anyone whose tried to decipher cloud computing I will hereby explain what the Mary Poppins is going on and how it’s going to impact IT management and specifically BTM over the next few years. I will start by saying that things are going to get more complex and significant challenges are ahead for vendors who are looking to provide next generation IT management software. There are several acronyms you need to understand as well so I’ll get cracking:
Private Clouds – think of these as on-premise utility/grid computing with the virtualization of OS and application run-time environments across the enterprise. An example might be a grid of 500 J2EE servers which are virtualized and shared across hundreds of different applications within an enterprise.
Public Clouds – this is simply off-premise utility computing provided by a 3rd party vendor. For example, Amazon EC2 or Rackspace where businesses can buy computing resource on-demand which are accessed remotely across the internet (hence it being public).
SaaS – Software As A Service. Enterprise Applications that are hosted on the internet by a 3rd party vendor. For example, Salesforce.com, Success Factors or GoogleMail where businesses log into a website that provides them with specific services that aid their business.
PaaS – Platform As A Service. Application Run-time platforms that are provided by 3rd party vendors across the internet. For example, Google App Engine or Salesforce.com’s AppExchange. The ability for business to build new applications using 3rd party frameworks or run-time environments. For example, many businesses will store their customer data within Salesforce.com, using AppExchange they can build new applications on top of this data.
IaaS – Infrastructure As A Service. Essentially the same as Public clouds where businesses can buy servers or computing power on demand from a 3rd party hosting provider.
Hybrid Cloud – combination of all of the above.
- More complexity on the way
Some of the above is probably common knowledge and I’m betting someone will comment on this blog telling me the above descriptions are not entirely accurate. The key problem with the above is that enterprise applications are going to become more fragmented and distributed across multiple deployment platforms which are not all controlled by the customer. To add to this we’ve just had a decade of SOA projects which essentially increased the number of dependencies between applications so when a user executes a business transaction these days it’s likely to pass through several application architectures. Why is this important? It multiples the complexity and demands of IT management software which up until now has still struggled to monitor and manage single applications let alone multiple connected applications. In summary a blackbox application becomes a blackbox of blackboxes with multiple points of failure and dependencies. Visibility of how the business (transactions) executes across these blackboxes therefore becomes key to effectively managing the business and IT. Business Transaction Management solutions will be key to providing this much needed visibility across the many types of blackboxes regardless of whether they’re in a data centre, in a cloud or being managed by a 3rd party vendor. You can only manage and control what you can see, as many enterprise applications move to the cloud its critical customers maintain their visibility of how their business executes across IT.
CEP doesn’t have to be complex
By Anonymous, January 2011.
One of my favourite sports is Formula 1. For the unfamiliar it involves 22 cars racing flat out at over 200mph with drivers bums 2mm from the ground with many of them crashing and going up in flames (see below). It differs from traditional Nascar racing in the fact it has these things called “corners” which make it more tricky for the drivers to overtake. Formula 1 is a big business with many teams spending over £150 million plus a year to make their car faster than everyone else. It’s a global sport with significant sponsorship, TV revenue and an opportunity for car manufacturers to compete. To say business impact doesn’t occur in Formula 1 is pretty much the same as saying no-one gets hurt in boxing.
All Businesses can go up in flames
So how do these teams minimize business impact and make their cars finish races? Firstly they have a lot of talented people whose job it is to design, develop, test and support these cars that cost £1.5 million each. Secondly they are experts in monitoring and improving one important metric: performance. Each car has 2,500 metres of wiring and over 250 sensors which continuously monitor the performance of car components in real-time. The data from these sensors is often known as “telemetry” which are fed into a computer and then analyzed by test or race engineers. Over a race distance millions of events are captured from each car and are used by the pit wall to help their cars finish the race. Engine temps, tyre temps, brake wear, hydraulic pressure, tyre pressures, brake temps, clutch wear – the list is endless. The job of the race engineers and their computers is to spot which events matter so they can take pro-active action (Complex Event Processing). They make definitive decisions to directly increase the performance and reliability of their car so it can finish the race as high as it possibly can. For example, if tyre pressures are low it could mean a number of things from a simple slow puncture to a problem with the brakes which is causing tyre temps to drop thus impacting tyre pressure. The last thing a Formula 1 team want to do is pit their car so they need process and analyse multiple events to make the right decision. Just like failing businesses go out of business so does Formula 1 teams with the recent departures of BMW, Toyota and Honda.
A formula 1 car must be fast and reliable for its team to be successful. The same principle can be applied to any business out there that has mission critical applications or business services. Slow performance and outages have a direct business impact. The only difference is that there is probably a lot more wiring (networks) and sensors (agents) used to monitor every angle of an application through the various OSI layers. Complex Event Processing engines add significant benefit to gaining meaningful real-time intelligence from data that is collected. It allowing monitoring solutions to become smarter with the data they collect and present, it also makes monitoring solutions aware of data from other sources that may explain why specific events are being observed. For example, if an application tier goes down the monitoring solution may throw an alert. However, if this was planned downtime or a change request then the tier outage is perfectly valid. With CEP capabilities it’s possible to build simple rules that prevent false positives and alert storming. For example, a CEP engine can process a tier outage event and then query the change management repository to see if downtime is planned, if not it can then alert to say the tier has been verified down. This is just a very simple example of how a CEP engine can significantly enhance traditional IT monitoring solutions.
In fact, the power of CEP is exactly why OpTier recently introduced its Business Events module (BEM) so our customers can gain better intelligence into what is impacting their business. In the same way we use the market leading Oracle database to persist our data we use a market leading CEP engine to process events from the millions of business transactions we collect each day. For every business transaction captured we know which application, business process, user, location, tiers and protocols it touched along with the KPI such as latency, resource and SLA for those respective entities. So if a user from an unauthorized IP subnet executes a business transaction we can detect it in real-time and notify the application security team. Again, just a simple example of how CEP capabilities can enhance Business Transaction Management.
iBTM – Business Transaction Management for the iPhone
By Anonymous, 28th October 2010.
Those of you who read my “Another less is more blog for ITSM and BSM solutions” blog back in October of last year will remember my bitterness around owning a BlackBerry whilst the entire nation around me was stroking their iPhones. Well in the last twelve months I finally managed to come up with a cunning way of acquiring an iPhone. My plan was simple, build an iPhone application for my company’s Business Transaction Management solution and then kindly request an iPhone from my company to perform user acceptance testing on. This plan sounds all very simple but there is a catch, I would have to write the PRD for this iPhone application along with finding a developer to help me build it (my developer days faded back in 2005). Bearing in mind I’ve never used iOS or stroked an iPhone I set out to do some market research to help me define a set of requirements and screen designs.
So where did you think I looked first? www.formula1.com . Yes, I’m mental and obsessed with cars but believe it or not this turned out to be the best bit of research I’ve done. Three hours after visiting the Formula1 website and downloading their application from the AppStore I had the iBTM PRD nailed with use cases, requirements and screen designs. The thing that struck me the most with the F1 app was how easy and simple it was to find the information I was looking for. In a stroke and two clicks I could go from a race to a session to live timing on track, the information was presented so clearly even a goldfish could keep up with what was happening in the race. So my initial thoughts for iBTM were “wouldn’t it be cool to go from an Application to a Business Transaction to its Tiers in two clicks”. In the same way Formula1 delivers timing of drivers lap times and sectors I could do the same with Applications, Transactions and Tier timing along with their SLA status. A user could view a list of their applications, spot an SLA breach, click on an application and view its business transactions, check which business transaction was breaching and click again to view the Tier latency/SLA management to see what was causing those breaches. I could also allow a user to start from an alert so they could go Alert > Application > Transaction > Tiers and understand what caused the alert in seconds. Here is my screen PRD mock-ups for the App:
So how does it work? Simply put, we built the app using the iPhone SDK (thanks to our superstar developer Mark Berner!), then we built a web services API for our BTM management servers (we allow federation) that allows iBTM to communicate so it can query information from OpTier BTM. Connectivity wise iPhone’s now come with comprehensive VPN capabilities that allow iPhones to connect to corporate networks either through 3G or WiFi. We’ve been testing connectivity and response times from all over the world and iBTM is super fast no matter where your accessing it from (it actually doesn’t retrieve that much data). With the recent hype around iPads life got sweeter as iBTM runs just fine with the standard x2 zoom you get for native iPhone applications. Here is a photo of an iPad working with iBTM connecting to one of our test BTM management servers:
iBTM works on the iPad and iPhone
Feedback from analysts, customers and prospects has been very encouraging. We’ve seen several executives get really hyped over a simple application that provides them with powerful visibility and intelligence into their business transactions, infrastructure and application performance. In two clicks an Executive or Application Owner can determine business impact and isolate which part of IT is causing SLA breaches all from the comfort of their iPhone or iPad. We’re already working on v2 of iBTM so stay tuned! Watch my youtube overview of iBTM:
You can download OpTier iBTM from the Apple AppStore.
4 in 5 Americans would pick up the phone if they ran into difficulties online w/insurance companies
During the ACORD Loma Insurance Systems Forum last month, we heard a lot of talk about customer efficiency and improving customer experience. Today, we announced the results of a survey conducted for OpTier by Ipsos Public Affairs that also points to the need for insurers to provide a better online experience for customers.
Some of the most interesting results of the survey include:
- Four out of five Americans (83 percent) are likely to resolve any issues they experience in purchasing or processing a claim online by reaching for the phone.
- Young people aged 18-34 are 10 percentage points more likely than older consumers to have already purchased or plan to purchase or research health insurance online (25 percent vs. 15 percent, respectively).
We all know that online customers looking to resolve claims and other issues via phone are an expensive proposition for insurance companies. BTM is one way for insurance companies to be sure online operations are keeping pace with customer needs. Solutions such as OpTier BTM help to alert staff to problems in real time so issues such as slow response times are resolved before they impact customer service.
You can find the full results of our survey on the Ipsos website at http://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=4797.
In addition, to learn more about how BTM can help insurance companies to improve customer service, listen to our recent webcast with Forrester’s Ellen Carney where we discuss how to manage dynamic IT change in a complex insurance environment.
Decluttering IT: An EbizQ Podcast featuring Colin Rowland
On May 17th, Kaitlin Brunsden, Associate Editor at EbizQ, sat down with OpTier’s own Colin Rowland to discuss the growing complexities of IT departments and ways that they can cut through the clutter and resolve problems more effectively moving forward.
Building a next generation BTM UI
by Anonymous, 20th April 2010.
It’s the day after we put the finishing touches to a brand new BTM UI and I feel like I’ve gone 12 rounds with Mike Tyson. It’s true what they say though, No Pain No Gain. I’ve been on the ropes, been knocked down several times but like Elton John says “I’m still standing”. A new baby is born and its certainly not an ugly one. I am expecting a few tears though when our field organization and customers gets their hands on it and start to shake it for the first time.
To be precise or wily it’s taken 18 months, 125 pages, 50+ detailed designs, 65 flights (most to Tel Aviv), 50+ customer meetings/webex’s, thousands of emails, hundreds of arguments, thousands of beers (5 beers per argument) and a good few hundred bugs. All for the sake of Business Transaction Management. Has it been worth it? Absolutely.
About 18 months ago OpTier made a decision to build a next generation BTM user interface. It was becoming increasingly clear from customers and prospects that the value of BTM touched many stakeholders in the business and IT. Our previous GUI was more focused towards the technical audience being application support teams and application developers. When you track all transactions across all tiers all of the time and provide response time, SLA and resource consumption metrics by Application, Transaction, User, Location and Tiers you end up collecting a lot of valuable information. The problem is how do you show all this information to the right user in the right context? What is relevant for an application owner isn’t always relevant for an application support team or a capacity planner. Showing a technical view to a business stakeholder is like an English person receiving an Hebrew menu in an Israeli restaurant (not good when you’re hungry). Therefore one of the first decisions we made was to make our BTM GUI role based so we could support a variety of users and use cases. Simply put, a user logs in and is presented with a series of “activities” relevant to their role. Each activity (e.g. problem isolation) has a series of tailored views which allows the user to perform that activity using information which is only relevant to that user. For example, a business user is typically interested in business transaction volume, activity and SLA compliance – they don’t really care about CPU usage, tier chattiness or how many I/O operations happen when a business transaction is executed.
The second key decision we made was to make the GUI extensible from both an architecture and user perspective. It’s obviously good to provide out of the box roles, activities and views for our customers. However, the needs of every customer and user is different no matter how hard you try to support every use case. Therefore users can simply create their own roles, activities and views to make BTM information more relevant to them incorporating their own context, terminology and processes. With 13 dimensions (application, transaction, users, locations, tiers, …), 100+ available metrics, 3 working modes, 10 different visualizations (table, charts, clouds, GoogleMaps, …) and a slick graphic design built on top of Flex technology the possibilities to our users are now endless. In the current beta release we support 10 BTM activities with over 75 different BTM views, if users want something different they can go right ahead and create whatever activity and view they wish. Over the next 18 months we’ll be adding more dimensions, metrics and visualization that will help customers truly manage IT from a business perspective, the future is bright.
The last key decision was to outsource the whole usability and graphic design aspects of our GUI. OpTier specializes in tracking transactions across tiers, it does not specialize in designing user interfaces. BTM is our business, usability is someone else’s business (Puzzlehead in this case). I can tell you right now though usability is a political hot potato. Get 2 people in the same room and you’ll get two different opinions on what is intuitive, get 25 people in the room and you’ll get 25 different opinions. You’d be surprised how many times I heard the words “When I used to develop GUI we did it like this…”. As Einstein once said “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”. When you work with a usability company you’re implicitly trusting them to do the right thing based on your inputs and feedback. Unless your open minded with usability experts you’ll always look to the past instead of looking into the future. What was relevant 10 years ago in GUI might not be relevant in 2010. GUI from my perspective is more art than science, it has to capture the imagination and invite the user to play. Larry Ellison once said “When you innovate you’ve got to be prepared for people to tell you you’re crazy.”
Like anything which is brand new though, we’ll have our issues. I’m not naïve enough to think that our new GUI will be perfect from day one, it’s a significant improvement and departure from our existing GUI. We’ll be able to show more value than we could have possibly imagined 18 months ago with our previous GUI. Our users can access BTM value in a single click depending on what they are trying to accomplish. You want to see your application CPU consumption over time? Click on this view. You want to understand the business impact of the release you’ve just released to production? Click on this view. You want to see the individual transactions user X executed? Click on this view.
I see this GUI as the start of something new and exciting rather than the end of just another GUI project. GUI’s should evolve and provide users with something fresh, unique and exciting. Innovation isn’t about standing back and admiring what you’ve delivered in the past, it’s about constantly listening to what your customers want and coming up with killer ideas so you can deliver that competitive edge to your business and your customers business.
BTM – the pain relief for CMDB?
by Anonymous, 2nd November 2009.
I have yet to meet a satisfied customer with a CMDB. It’s not like I go looking everyday but somehow the subject always seems to arise and people tend to get quite touchy on the subject. It wasn’t so long ago I worked for a company who spent a fortune acquiring an application discovery and mapping solution. It promised auto-discovery in real-time and all those wonderful things yet it seemed to die a cold death months after the acquisition closed. I listened to the sales pitches around “When applications go down the first question asked is ‘What changed’?” and the famous “75% of application outages are related to change”. To me that’s like stating the bloody obvious, of course something changed, if nothing changed the application would be still running.
The problem these early discovery & mapping solutions lacked is business context. They were inherently built to track IT interactions from server to server and technology to technology. They’d scan server ports, executables and protocols to try and piece together the relationships between IT assets within a data centre. Or they’d do it by listening to the actual interactions. They’d paint pretty little diagrams like the London Tube Map and then give you all the technology, versions and patch levels these assets were running. Some solutions were priced per cpu which can be highly lucrative when vendors told customers to put an agent on every server in their data centre. Unfortunately the one thing they didn’t discover or understand was the business services that ran across these IT assets. Applications and Business Services these days don’t just relate to 4 apache web servers, 8 weblogic servers and 1 Oracle database. The pervasiveness of SOA and mashups these days means a single IT asset can serve one or more business services. Applications and IT Assets no longer have a 1 to many relationship, an application isn’t simply a collection of segmented IT assets.
I did a search on Wikipedia for CMDB and found the quote “A key success factor in implementing a CMDB is the ability to automatically discover information about the CIs (auto-discovery) and track changes as they happen.”. If a business service is a CI then that’s a pretty tough proposition to auto-discover and track change on. How do you discover business context from IT assets? For starters you can stop looking at the IT assets for answers, you’ll get your versions and patch levels of Linux but you won’t get a description of your business services that flow through them.
I’ll put my head on a lance and state that Business Transaction Management (BTM) can add significant value to any CMDB project. When you start to monitor business transactions you start to acquire lots of key intelligence on how your business runs and maps to IT. You auto-discover transaction flows and the IT assets they interact with, all in real-time. It also gets better, you can store all this data historically so that you can report and compare business services and their CI’s before and after a change. You can even visualise how the business and IT asset dependencies change over time using transaction flow/topology diagrams as key evidence. When a change occurs on an IT asset you can instantly report whether this change had a positive or negative impact on your business services or transactions by reviewing related latency and SLA. I’m not claiming BTM is the answer to all CMDB pain but it solves some of the most basic and common challenges:
- Auto-discovers business services and their IT dependencies in real-time
- Stores information historically so you can track, report and quantify change when it occurs
Maybe BTM is the pain relief CMDB projects need right now.
BTM what is it for me?… really
While on my spinning bicycle in class this early morning on a cool New York day, I was cycling and grooving alon
g on Diana Ross “if there’s a cure for THIS, i don’t want it”….. Being thankful I have time to do things I love. It reminded me of discussion I had with people working in IT multiple times; we IT have it though there is very little time for personal life:
we know our users are complaining, we know we are losing business, we have been trying to identify the issue for days, I am losing credibility, I missed several friends dinner, I work every weekends, I have to leave the office now because I have to jump on a change management conference call while driving with the kids screaming in the back of the car. I have other things on my plate, like launching our new private banking services, budgeting for new servers to address our merger with ABC company, I need to grow my business, we can’t even have a feel on how our services behave nor identifying simple problem such as one out of five times the browser hangs when entering employee badge number. The assumption I made last week on where the problem might have been are now wrong, the change management team applied a patch against that specific application and the problem didn’t go away. I am stress and tired…. I am stress and tired…. I am stress and tired…. I am stress and tired….
IT experts would say: “I have tools several, several, several, several tools, and it is true after triaging all the alerts, the tools were able to isolate issues but I really just care about what impacted my users in company ABC. What is the behavior of my most revenue generating transactions today and what will it be after we merge the two companies’ systems next week, how would I know if it improves or degrades the overall business service?”Familiar with THIS? What if you would take a peek at introducing Business Transaction Management (BTM) into your IT process?
You would finally see at this moment the IT consumers and IT producers of business transaction information, knowing whom and what is impacted, focusing only on the most important services. What if you knew the exact flow of the information and the behavior of your special revenue generating credit card application transactions? BTM is a source of rich IT information. It is much more than incident management, you can not only understand the current behavior and plan for growing your business you can see the impact on your services of an unplanned or planned change.
This is the cure to resolve the “THIS”, today, tomorrow, next week, on a constantly changing fluid IT environment. Really who could have predicted that you would transact business via text messages? With this information on hand feel free to use those specialized tools and apply them appropriately to isolate granular application components issues but change the way you think about managing IT, It is not always about technical components. Now, I won’t cure all your stress and fatigue as there always be screaming kids, traffic, lines at the coffee shop but one less thing to worry about, getting a little more of your personal life back, one more thing to proudly walk to your management and really feeling good that you know the “THIS” at every moment of the day and I guarantee you will be grooving along a Disco song….
Another “Less is More” Blog for ITSM and BSM Solutions
I’m jealous and in denial with several of my colleagues at work. It may have the “compare the meerkat” ring tone but my mobile phone was replaced last week with a new model of berry and I have to report I still feel inferior. It’s like I just traded a Porsche Boxster for a Boxster S, sure it’s a nice upgrade but everything is relative and unfortunately everyone around me is driving a 911 Turbo at the moment in the form of an iPhone.
Still, I’m not bitter. I think the introduction and innovation of the iPhone was exactly the kick up the ass that the mobile phone market needed. Think different is what Apple did and I think many IT vendors today should be following the same type of attitude for IT service management solutions. If I rewind the clock back just 5 years I owned a Sony Ericsson phone to make calls, a canon 2MegaPixel camera to take photos, an iPod “brick edition” to listen to music and a Dell laptop (also Brick Edition) to surf the web and do email. Today, I can get all that from an iPhone. The good news according to all my smug friends is that this iPhone thing actually works and is also quite sexy or something. The fact the camera, ipod, phone and browser are all integrated into the handset with an intuitive user interface is what is most impressive. If I owned an iPhone I wouldn’t need to buy 4 products from 4 different vendors.
ITSM & BSM - Lots of pieces integrated but not the picture you expected.
Now try comparing with what I just said against the IT service management landscape today. Customers are buying ten to twenty point products to manage the different functions and components of IT. Most of which were never intended to work with each other from day one and have so many customisations that migrating to new versions is like moving house rather than redecorating the one you already own. Customers buy separate tools to manage end users, networks, servers, JVM’s, CLR’s, databases, storage and that is just a short list. That’s a lot of GUI, in fact that’s a lot of user logins and products to physically deploy, train and support across your IT organisation. And yet so often we hear the words “Less is More” used in conversation and sales pitches despite many vendors being responsible for most of this huge complexity in the first place. The key issue isn’t so much the number of products, it’s the way in which real users can navigate and perform real use cases to exploit the information across multiple products so they can manage IT more effectively. Dashboards in my opinion do not solve this issue, they provide a quick fix and band aid which is often used by a sales team to try and promote “single pane of glass” views and “OOTB integration” yet in reality dashboards often limit navigation and task orientated use cases where you need to go from high level to low level data using a common context.
We announced a new product at OpTier last week which helps customers understand and manage their end user experience. Rather than create a new standalone product we listened to customers right from the start and did what they asked. We built the new product using the same framework we used to build our first product CoreFirst. Customers get all the benefits and features of a new product but they get it without all the drawbacks of buying yet another product to manage their IT services and components. They have a single GUI, a single data repository and a single user login to access both our products. Customers now get visibility of their end user experience with a complete profile of the business transactions that constructed those experiences all in a single click. We hid the technical complexity just like Apple did with the iPhone and on top of the integration we also decided to make the GUI more sexy in the process.
I may not own an iPhone but that doesn’t stop me appreciating what can be learnt from such innovation.
Business Service Management – well what can I say
I’ll be honest “Business Service Management” as a phrase has never sounded exciting for me. It sounds generic, woolly and uses words that generate flashbacks of my university lectures delivered by people with red jumpers and beards. Needless to say I did some digging recently on the internet and was pleasantly surprised by the wealth of information and vendors who have a story in this space. As you might guess the definition of BSM varies, which is ok until you begin to think “Do I just make up my own definition of BSM or do I work with someone else’s?”.
BSM opinions talk a lot about managing IT from a business perspective. To be honest I haven’t seen an enterprise software pitch that doesn’t talk about aligning the business with IT these days. For me though, the aligning bit is more of a mindset than a killer enabling technology, process or methodology. The way an employee approaches things or thinks has a lot to do with how they manage or work. IT exists solely to deliver a competitive edge to the business that funds it. If every person in IT thought “What impact am I having on the business” once or twice a day then its my belief that the business and IT would be closer aligned, more efficient and more successful. I’ve never been a fan of IT outsourcing for this exact reason – do the people working for a 3rd party IT outsourcer ever think or care about the business they are supporting or impacting? A few do but most probably don’t I’d imagine.
Here we are in a gloomy recession where business performance is all that matters. Huge losses and decreased revenue for many businesses have resulted in cost cutting and a focus on re-prioritizing business functions and services. How much do businesses spend on service X, Y and Z and how much do they make from X,Y and Z. It would be foolish to think that businesses would continue to invest in services that didn’t generate a return. The next bit is then figuring out where all these business services exist within the world of IT. If you’re going to focus on service X, Y and Z and de-commission A, B and C then you absolutely need to understand where X, Y, Z, A, B and C exist and what dependencies they have with each other and the applications/infrastructure that underpins them.
If businesses are going to start changing people’s mindsets in IT then they need to provide them with the right tools so they can start to learn how the business runs on IT. I bet most DBA’s have no idea which business transactions or services are executing against their schema’s these days. You might be sceptical and say why is this important? Should a DBA tune the top 10 slowest SQL Statements? or should they tune the SQL statements that relate to the top 10 business services? This is where BSM technology like Business Transaction Management (BTM) comes in handy. When you can track all business services and transactions across your entire infrastructure you gain this visibility of how the business runs on IT. With intelligence into business transaction latency, resource consumption and SLA across all tiers you begin to see first hand the real impact IT has on the business. Business services have been running across IT for decades, with BSM and enabling technology like BTM its only now IT is beginning to see the bigger picture.
I know it sounds simple but if you work in IT try thinking once or twice a day what impact will you have on your business. If you don’t know then its worth exploring what BSM and enabling technology like BTM can do for you.
OpTier
Assaf Amit
Andy Wetzel
Russell Rothstein
Motti Tal
Linh C. Ho
Diego Lomanto
